And so to compensate, they still make it with no check points to make it harder. Medal of Honor Rising Sun(GC): I am not one to complain about graphics, but Rising Sun is a reskin of Frontline, with a worse story, glitchy and buggy, and like half of the levels. But the biggest problem that makes this good gamecube game, is the checkpoint system, which does not exist making this game 10 times harder than it needs to be. Like a ft away from a corner, it still counts as hitting the hit box of the corner. Great Levels, but probably the most shocking hit boxes ever. Medal of Honor Frontline(GC): This is where my opinion where the Medal of Honor Frontline began to take a dive. Medal of Honor Allied Assault (PC): Another great hit with great pc controls. Another PS1 'Hidden Gem' for being a ps1 fps that no one talks about. Medal of Honor Underground (PS1): A great sequel that does enough to make it different from it's previous game, like having mostly different missions. A PS1 'Hidden Gem' for being a ps1 fps that no one talks about. Please note I did not play the multiplayer because I don't have anyone else to play these mostly bad games. So here I will review every game in the series I have played so far.

But I do admit that some of them are good. Or the games are incredibly unfair to increase game length. The majority of the games are the same, with a lot of them having mostly the same missions.(At least 3-4 Games have Operation Husky as a Mission). And after reading all of the reviews and posts about Medal of Honor, I have to mostly disagree. I was introduced with Medal of Honor Frontline, after playing EA's other game, 007: NightFire. I played the majority of the Medal of Honor games.

Medal of honor pacific assault controls